All Posts

Ordinance 251210 would provide tenant protections for demolished buildings. Relocation assistance would be required for affected occupants, with increased assistance for lower-income tenants.

If approved, Ordinance 250941 would waive certain impact fees in the Market and Octavia Area.

This ordinance would expand uses allowed in Historic Buildings citywide and eliminate Conditional Use requirements in historic buildings in some Eastern Neighborhood Areas where PDR uses, Institutional Community uses, and Arts Activities uses are removed.

This ordinance would require buildings in San Francisco undergoing "major renovations" to convert to all-electric.

This ordinance would require project applicants to disclose the presence of any unauthorized dwelling units and would impose steep penalties to parties found to have submitted misleading plans.

If approved, this ordinance would allow certain Below Market Rate (BMR) units to be resold at higher prices.

If approved, this ordinance would allow non-licensed designers to work on some Assembly, Business, and Mercantile projects.

UPDATE: This ordinance was filed as Inactive on 6-21-24. Ordinance 231272 was introduced on 12-12-23 by Supervisor Peskin This...

UPDATE: No action has been taken on this Ordinance since 11-27-23. Ordinance 231219 was introduced on 11-27-23 by the Mayor. This...

UPDATE: This ordinance was filed as inactive on 7-11-24. Ordinance 230862 was introduced on 7-25-23 by the Mayor. This legislation would...

UPDATE: This ordinance was filed as inactive on 7-16-24. Ordinance 230834 was introduced on 7-18-23 by Supervisor Peskin. This...

UPDATE: This ordinance was filed as inactive on 2-28-24. Ordinance 230988 was introduced on 9-19-23 by Supervisor Stefani. This...

UPDATE: This ordinance was filed as Inactive on 1-8-25 . Ordinance 230735 was introduced on 6-13-23 by Supervisor Safai. This...

UPDATE: This legislation is currently under review with the Land Use and Transportation Committee. No action has been taken on this...

UPDATE: This legislation failed to pass the Land Use and Transportation Committee and was filed as inactive on 6-2-23. Ordinance 220997 ...

UPDATE: This legislation is currently under review by the Land Use and Transportation Committee. It was "continue to called to the chair"...

UPDATE: This legislation was re-referred to the Committee on Energy, Utilities, and Communications. It is scheduled for a hearing on...

UPDATE: This legislation is currently under review. It was passed by the Senate and introduced to the Assembly, but no action has been...

UPDATE: This legislation has been suspended. It was passed by the Senate in May 2023 and forwarded to the Assembly for review, but was...

UPDATE: This legislation failed to pass the Committee on Environmental Quality and has not progressed since March 2023. SB 794 was...

UPDATE: This legislation was approved by the Senate in May 2023 and forwarded to the Assembly. It has not progressed since June 2023. SB...

UPDATE: This legislation was approved by the Senate in May 2023 and forwarded to the Assembly. It was suspended in July 2023. SB 597 was...

UPDATE: This legislation failed passage by the Senate and was placed into inactive status on 5-31-23 . SB 466 was introduced by Senator...

UPDATE: This legislation was placed into suspension on 5-18-23. SB 405 was introduced by Senator Cortese on 2-9-23. This bill would...